State v. Visser’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Manussier · Parsons v. Barnes · State ex rel. A.R. & C.P. v. C.R. · State v. Lafferty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether counsel's performance was deficient, [this court] . 'presume[s] that counsel has rendered adequate assistance.... Thus, if the challenged act or omission might be considered sound trial strategy, we will not find that it demonstrates inadequacy of counsel'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“he was 'prejudiced' by the ineffective assistance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[When reviewing questions of fact, we defer to the trial court's findings and do not set them aside unless clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.