2001 UT App 225 - Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2021
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nova Casualty Co. v. Able Construction, Inc. · DeBry v. Noble · State ex rel. M.W. · 21 Utah 2d 351 - United Factors v. T. C. Associates, Inc. · State in Interest of HRV
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless we determine the [district] court has exceeded the scope of permitted discretion or has acted contrary to law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he stipulation constitutes an agreement of the parties that all the facts necessary to support it ... pre-existed and would be sustained by available evidence, had not the agreement of the parties dispensed with the taking of evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]y signing a custody stipulation that reserved only visitation, Father implicitly agreed that his parental presumption had been rebutted and that [the child's] best interests were served by giving custody to the [grandparents].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.