Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UT App 232 - Pack v. Case

2001 UT App 232 - Pack v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · Jeffs v. Stubbs · Mahmood v. Ross · Foote v. Clark · Nova Casualty Co. v. Able Construction, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[When a party who received attorney fees below prevails on appeal, the party is also entitled to fees reasonably incurred on appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Interpretation of the terms of a contract is a question of law,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The standard of review on appeal of [the amount of] a trial court's award of attorney fees is patent error or clear abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.