Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UT App 281 - State v. Coleman

2001 UT App 281 - State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wach · Orton v. Carter · State v. Banner · State v. Gamblin · State v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “question( ] of law which we review for correctness, according no particular deference to the [Juvenile] court's interpretation.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A finding of 'good cause' that will excuse failure of the prosecution to bring a defendant to trial within the time required means (1) delay caused by the defendant-such as asking for a continuance; or (2) 'a relatively short delay caused by unforeseen problems arising immediately prior to trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “An appellate court will find abuse of discretion only where there is no 'reasonable basis in the record to support' the trial court's Speedy Trial Statute determination of 'good cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.