Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UTAPP 3 - State v. Loya

State v. Loya’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Stoner v. California · State v. Pena · United States v. Rahme · United States v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “([a] trial court's factual findings are reviewed deferentially under the clearly erroneous standard, and its conclusions of law are reviewed for correctness with some discretion given to the application of the legal standards to the underlying factual findings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.