2001 UT App 317 - State v. Tueller’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2020
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Menzies · State v. Litherland · State v. Kohl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a touching of [genitalia] occurring between an adult and child could reasonably give rise to an inference of intent because there is 'no conceivable explanation for the circumstances ... other than to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Having failed to properly preserve the issue of judicial bias for our review, Defendant must show either 'plain error' or 'exceptional circumstances' before we can review the issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“accompanied by a certificate that the motion is filed in good faith and shall be supported by an affidavit stating facts sufficient to show bias ... or conflict of interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.