Bailey v. Bayles’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2024
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pena · Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. · 23 Utah 2d 222 - Limb v. Federated Milk Producers Association · Orton v. Carter · Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of Wellsville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any cohabitant ... who has been subjected to abuse or domestic violence, or to whom there is a substantial likelihood of immediate danger of abuse or domestic violence, may seek an ex parte protective order or a protective order in accordance with this chapter, whether or not that person has left the residence or the premises in an effort to avoid further abuse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bailey v. Bayles“To obtain protective order, petitioner is required to demonstrate (1) petitioner is or was a cohabitant of the respondent, (2) petitioner had suffered physical abuse or domestic violence, and (8) petitioner had an imminent fear of physical harm or, put another way, a present fear of future abuse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patole v. Marksberry“To obtain a protective order under [the CAA], petitioner was required only to demonstrate: (1) she is or was a cohabitant of the respondent ...; (2) she had suffered physical abuse or domestic violence ...; and (3) she had an imminent fear of physical harm, or 'a present fear of future abuse'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patole v. Marksberry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.