2001 UT App 4 - State v. Horrocks’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2021
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Cruz · United States v. Santiago Soto · United States v. Combs · City of Monticello v. Christensen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[al trial court's decision to grant or deny a motion to dismiss presents a question of law, which we review for correctness.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bushman · State v. Selzer“almost universal recognition that jeopardy attaches when a court accepts a guilty plea ...,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“this court cannot disregard or overturn decisions of {[our] supreme court”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Smith · State v. Tilt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.