2001 UT App 75 - State v. Spry’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2020
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Conder · United States v. Perdomo · 53 Cal. 2d 755 - People v. Cooper · Ostler v. Buhler · Engstrom v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the proper interpretation of a rule of procedure is a question of law, and we review the trial court's decision for correctness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Except as otherwise provided or as privileged, the defense shall disclose to the prosecutor such information as required by statute relating to alibi or insanity and any other item of evidence which the court determines on good cause shown should be made available to the prosecutor in order for the prosecutor to adequately prepare his case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McNearney“requires only a showing that disclosure of requested evidence is necessary to the proper preparation of the defense " and "such a showing is made whenever the trial court is apprised of the fact that the evidence is material to an issue to be raised at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.