State v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

cited by 12 later decisions

states following

April 2019

most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Santobello v. New York · 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 384 Wis. 2d 271 - State v. R. D. J. (In re T.S.J.) · 387 Wis. 2d 686 - State v. T.R.C. (In re D.U.C.)
“counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. McDowell · 356 Wis. 2d 106 - State v. Pinno
“actually had an adverse effect on the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 384 Wis. 2d 271 - State v. R. D. J. (In re T.S.J.) · 387 Wis. 2d 686 - State v. T.R.C. (In re D.U.C.)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.