State v. Canon’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2023
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Harris v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“obvious and flagrant affront to the basic concepts of judicial proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[P]erjury erodes the integrity of our judicial system.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“only impeaching in character is not ordinarily grounds for a new trial, but it may well be that newly discovered evidence impeaching in character might be produced so strong as to constitute grounds for a new trial; as for example, where it is shown that the verdict is based upon perjured testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.