State v. Tye’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably State v. Popenhagen (2008), State v. Sveum (2010)
2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Massachusetts v. Sheppard · State v. Eason · United States v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he purpose of an oath or affirmation is to impress upon the swearing individual an appropriate sense of obligation to tell the truth ... by creating liability for perjury”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]his court has long recognized an oath or affirmation as an essential prerequisite to obtaining a valid search warrant under the state constitution.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[the exclusionary rule applies when no oath or affirmation supports a search warrant ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.