Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 WI 31 - State v. Black

State v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Cain (2012), 296 Wis. 2d 421 - State v. HOLSONBACK (2006)

2 federal appellate · 53 state decisions

310200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Staples v. United States · 207 Wis. 2d 155 - Lake City Corp. v. City of Mequon · 231 Wis. 2d 293 - County of Jefferson v. Renz · 130 Wis. 2d 4 - Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'n · 188 Wis. 2d 695 - State v. Thiel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] factual basis for a plea exists if an inculpa-tory inference can be drawn from the complaint or facts admitted to by the defendant even though it may conflict with an exculpatory inference elsewhere in the record and the defendant later maintains that the exculpatory inference is the correct one.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In this context, 'possess' . . . simply 'means that the defendant knowingly had actual physical control of a firearm.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The essence of what a defendant waives when he or she enters a guilty or no contest plea”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.