State v. Matejka’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Williams (2001), State v. Williams (2002)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“One who consents to a search 'may of course delimit as [she] chooses the scope of the search to which [she] consents.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The scope of a search is generally defined by its expressed object.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.