Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 WIAPP 103 - State v. Watkins

State v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · Gross v. Hoffman · 70 Wis. 2d 179 - Ocanas v. State · 197 Wis. 2d 772 - Foseid v. State Bank of Cross Plains

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “grabbed me by the sweatshirt, and he just literally pulled me out of my chair so hard that I was off my feet, but he slammed his fist into my jaw, which loosened my lower plate and ended up cutting my gum pretty bad. He said I ought to fuck you up, I could kill you, and he just hurled me backwards in the chair, chair went over, I slammed into the wall.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Watkins stated that when [Malone] got a couple of feet away from Watkins, [Malone] grabbed for Watkins' gun arm and Watkins let his instincts go and every thing happened so fast, he just heard a boom and saw [Malone] go down. Watkins stated that he did not intentionally shoot [Malone], it just went off by instincts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We cannot conclude ... as a matter of law, that a person, fearing further attack, who arms himself with a loaded gun, points it at the aggressor, warns him to stay away, and calls for help has precluded the invocation of an accident defense to a shooting that occurs when the aggressor struggles for the gun.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.