Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 WI App 136 - State v. Wolfe

2001 WI App 136 - State v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2022

16 state decisions

120200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · New Jersey v. New York · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan · 105 Wis. 2d 231 - State v. Clausen · 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The person is within 90 days of discharge or release ... from a secured correctional facility, as defined in s. 938.02(15m) ... if the person was placed in the facility for being adjudicated delinquent under s. 938.183 or 938.34 on the basis of a sexually violent offense or from a commitment order that was entered as a result of a sexually violent offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In [.Faucher and other cases published at the same time], the court clarified the previously turbid state of juror bias jurisprudence in Wisconsin, adopting the terms 'statutory,1 'subjective' and 'objective' bias to replace the misused 'implied,' 'actual' and 'inferred' bias terminology.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The jury needed to consider evidence of relevant past conduct to determine whether Wolfe had a mental disorder which predisposed him to commit acts of sexual violence and whether there was a substantial probability that he would commit acts of sexual violence in the future.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.