2001 WI App 15 - State v. Longcore’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 141 Wis. 2d 81 - State v. Michels · 73 Wis. 2d 318 - State v. Wachsmuth · 215 Wis. 2d 430 - Lincoln Savings Bank, S.A. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue · 176 Wis. 2d 610 - Doe v. American National Red Cross · 184 Wis. 2d 57 - In Interest of Peter B.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The goal of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to the legislature's intent. The primary source of interpretation is the statutory language itself. If the language is unambiguous, resort to extrinsic aid for purposes of statutory interpretation would be improper. If the language is clear and unambiguous oh its face, we merely apply that language to the facts at hand. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“glass so treated or combined with other materials as to reduce, in comparison with ordinary sheet glass or plate glass, the likelihood of injury to persons by objects from external sources or by glass when the glass is cracked or broken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mercier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.