2001 WI App 158 - State v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably State v. Peters (2003), State v. Miller (2002)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Toussie v. United States · 93 Wis. 2d 287 - MacK v. State · 112 Wis. 2d 119 - State v. Riekkoff · 188 Wis. 2d 695 - State v. Thiel · 96 Wis. 2d 183 - John v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, used the debit/credit card of a person who was not Mason. Second, used the debit/credit card to obtain something of value. Third, acted without the authorization or consent of the cardholder while knowing that he did not have authorization or consent. Fourth, represented that he was the debit/credit cardholder or that he was acting with the authorization or consent of the holder.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“This crime has four elements: (1) the defendant's intentional use of the personal identifying information or document; (2) the defendant's use of such information to obtain credit, money, goods, services, or any thing else of value; (3) the defendant's use of such information without the authorization or consent of the other person; and (4) the defendant's intentional representation that he or she was the other person or acted with such person's authorization or consent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““We think this is far too narrow a concept of the value of Ramirez’s employment at Trek Bike. True, Ramirez obtained employment at Trek Bike. But what Ramirez ultimately sought and obtained was the compensation and other economic benefits that flowed from the employment. Obviously these were things of value within the meaning of [the statute].” 246 Wis. 2d at 808 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.