State v. Fosnow’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2021
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 128 Wis. 2d 110 - State v. Holt · 97 Wis. 2d 72 - Steele v. State · 208 Wis. 2d 463 - State v. McCallum · 150 Wis. 2d 94 - State v. Michels · 163 Wis. 2d 241 - State v. Krieger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“carries the heavy burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that withdrawal of the plea is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[g]enerally[,] expert testimony does not constitute newly discovered evidence justifying a new trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Fosnow and his trial counsel were aware of a possible [dissociative identity disorder] diagnosis from [one of the examining psychiatrist’s] report and did not choose to obtain additional evaluations that might have supported it [prior to entry of the guilty plea].” 624 N.W.2d at 889-91 . In each case, unlike in Omdorffs case, the purported newly discovered evidence was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.