State v. Ortiz’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 93 Wis. 2d 433 - Wirth v. Ehly · 128 Wis. 2d 110 - State v. Holt · 179 Wis. 2d 469 - Scheunemann v. City of West Bend · 136 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Perry · 198 Wis. 2d 756 - State v. Schmaling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he fact remains that it was the police, not the city, who were the direct and actual victims of Ortiz's crimes. Ortiz did not threaten to injure the city—he threatened to injure the police officers. Ortiz did not fail to comply with an attempt by the city to take him into custody—he failed to comply with the police effort to take him into custody. Ortiz did not obstruct the city—he obstructed the police. And finally, Ortiz's disorderly conduct was not targeted at the city—it was targeted at the police.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“In any case, the restitution order may require that the defendant do one or more of the following: (a) Pay all special damages, but not general damages, substantiated by evidence in the record, which could be recovered in a civil action against the defendant for his or her conduct in the commission of a crime considered at sentencing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“was the following: Where the defendant's conduct indirectly causes damage or loss to the governmental entity, the entity is a passive, not a direct, victim and is not entitled to restitution. (Schmaling). Conversely, where the defendant's conduct directly causes damage or loss to the governmental entity, the entity is a direct or actual victim and is entitled to restitution. (Howard-Hastings and Schmaling). Id., ¶ 20. Applying this framework, we determined that the police officers — and not the city itself — were the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.