Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 WIAPP 246 - Gray v. Eggert

Gray v. Eggert’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 85 Wis. 2d 675 - Anderson v. Continental Insurance · 107 Wis. 2d 400 - Loy v. Bunderson · 119 Wis. 2d 34 - Englewood Community Apartments Ltd. Partnership v. Alexander Grant & Co. · 79 Wis. 2d 260 - Furrenes v. Ford Motor Co. · Klitzke v. Herm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court, not present at the mediation, is unlikely to appreciate all that took place there and, as a result, may not understand whether the parties mediated in "good faith." Moreover, a trial court that equates "good faith" with the fact or amount of settlement offers, or with the success of the parties in reaching resolution, may fail to recognize that sometimes mediation exposes that a case is not "about money," but rather, is about issues not neatly resolved in a formal legal setting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Wisconsin Stat. § 805.03 provides a trial court with the discretionary authority to strike the answer and responsive pleadings of a defendant and enter judgment for the plaintiff as a sanction for the defendant's failure to comply with any order of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Failure to comply with any term of this order shall be considered cause for imposing sanctions which may include the dismissal of claims and defenses. See § 804.12 and 805.03, Wis. Stats.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.