2001 WI App 281 - Schultz v. Natwick’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund · 192 Wis. 2d 156 - Martin Ex Rel. Scoptur v. Richards · Thorp v. Town of Lebanon · 193 Wis. 2d 299 - Reginald D. v. State · Matthies v. Positive Safety Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We doubt that the supreme court accepted the case [on bypass] solely to determine the rights of litigants who had one particular type of insurance coverage. Instead, we conclude that the court's references to "other defendants in tort actions," and "other insurers and insureds," and the court's balancing of broadly applicable private interests demonstrate that the court viewed the case as a facial challenge to the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schultz v. Natwick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.