Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 WI App 291 - State v. Malcom

2001 WI App 291 - State v. Malcom’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · 216 Wis. 2d 61 - State v. Keith · 153 Wis. 2d 445 - State v. Burke · 178 Wis. 2d 729 - State v. Frey · 141 Wis. 2d 653 - State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will uphold a [postconviction] court's exercise of discretion if it logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal standard, and used a demonstrated rational process to reach a conclusion a reasonable judge could reach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to conform to the proof where such amendment is not prejudicial to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.