2001 WI App 295 - State v. Eckola’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Hutnik · 97 Wis. 2d 426 - Wisconsin Ass'n of Food Dealers v. City of Madison · 54 Wis. 2d 61 - State v. Duffy · 148 Wis. 2d 204 - State v. Meddaugh · 230 Wis. 2d 32 - State v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The chief judge of each judicial administrative district shall adopt guidelines . . . for the consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jorgensen“the person be confined . . . for at least [the] mandatory or presumptive minimum period [required for that offense].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lalicata
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.