2001 WI App 32 - State v. Thiel’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · 197 Wis. 2d 279 - State v. Post · 211 Wis. 2d 194 - State v. Klessig · 96 Wis. 2d 549 - Pickens v. State · City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Counsel. If the person claims or appears to be indigent, the court shall refer the person to the authority for indigency determinations under [Wis. Stat. §] 977.07(1) and, if applicable, the appointment of counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones“[d]e-spite some fundamental similarities to other commitment proceedings, [Wis. Stat.] ch. 980 ultimately is unique and distinct from other civil commitment chapters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may retain or seek to have the court appoint an examiner as provided under [Wis. Stat.] s. 980.03(4).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.