State v. Bury’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 83 Wis. 2d 368 - Whitaker v. State · 153 Wis. 2d 445 - State v. Burke · 174 Wis. 2d 231 - State v. Richer · 231 Wis. 2d 245 - State v. Kittilstad · 20 Wis. 2d 431 - State v. Fish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“test, a prosecutor may bring additional charges in the information so long as the charges are not wholly unrelated to the transactions or facts considered or testified to at the preliminary examination, irrespective of whether direct evidence concerning the charges had been produced at the preliminary examination. State v. Burke, 153 Wis. 2d 445, 457 , 451 N.W.2d 739 (1990). The charges must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cotton“in a multiple-offense transaction case, once the defendant has been bound over for trial on at least one count relating to the transaction, the prosecutor may in the information charge additional counts not wholly unrelated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cotton“counts contained in the information must flow from the same transaction for which evidence has been introduced at the preliminary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cotton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.