2001 WI App 52 - State v. Thiel’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably DiCenzo v. A-Best Products Co. (2008), Davis v. Moore (2001)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Griffith v. Kentucky · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation · Great Northern Ry Co v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Does the rule "establish a new principle of law, either by overruling clear past precedent on which litigants may have relied, or by deciding an issue of first impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed"? (2) Will retroactive operation further or retard the operation of the rule in question? (3) Will retroactive application produce substantial inequitable results?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“At the trial to determine whether the person who is the subject of a petition under s. 980.02 is a sexually violent person, all rules of evidence in criminal actions apply. All constitutional rights available to a defendant in a criminal proceeding are available to the person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that the subject of the petition is within 90 days of release or discharge from a sentence imposed on the basis of a sexually violent offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.