2001 WI App 63 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tsu v. Tracy Federal Bank · 94 Wis. 2d 153 - County of Columbia v. Bylewski · 165 Wis. 2d 585 - Burkes v. Hales · 98 Wis. 2d 569 - State v. Braunsdorf · 111 Wis. 2d 571 - Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a greater degree of knowledge about his [or her] future [so that he or she] could begin more constructive planning and co-operate on a treatment program with the knowledge his [or her] efforts would not be minimized by the threat of unsatisfied charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“I'm assuming we are all interested in rehabilitating our inmates. We can't rehabilitate our inmates by keeping them in security classifications simply because there are charges pending elsewhere.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“the legislature has left the matter up to the courts to exercise its [sic] discretion to dismiss with prejudice in a proper case lest the statute have no meaning at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.