Nixon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Griffin v. Wisconsin · Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security · State v. Johnson · United States v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be able to point to specific and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant a belief * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · Fenton v. State“' " Nixon v. State, 2001 WY 15, ¶ 11 , 18 P.3d 631, 635 (Wyo.2001) (quoting Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868, 874 , 107 S.Ct. 3164, 3169 , 97 L.Ed.2d 709 (1987) and Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 480 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2600 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972)). More specifically, "a warrant based upon probable cause is not generally required before a parole officer may conduct a search to determine whether the parolee is violating the terms of his parole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“neither probationers nor parolees enjoy '”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.