State v. Radley’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2020
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Turner · State v. Hebert · State v. Black · State v. Carter · Northeast Bank & Trust Co. v. Soley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the record was made at or near the time of the events reflected in the record by, or from information transmitted by, a person with personal knowledge of the events recorded therein; (2) the record was kept in the course of a regularly conducted business; (3) it was the regular practice of the business to make records of the type involved; and (4) no lack of trustworthiness is indicated from the source of information from which the record was made or the method or circumstances under which the record was prepared.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nelson“custodian or other qualified witness” because she was not employed by the entity that created the reports and was not involved with creating, maintaining, or transmitting the reports) is not determinative in this case. 4 . Maine Rule of Evidence 1001(3) states: (3) Original. An”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.