Warner v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2025
2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bryant v. Bryant · MacDonald v. MacDonald · Schneider v. Richardson · MacDonald v. MacDonald · Kapler v. Kapler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Revised section 953(2)(E)(l)(a) establishes that to the extent a party demonstrates that the increase in value of a spouse’s nonmarital stock resulted from “market forces,” the increased value is nonmarital property regardless of whether the spouse or spouses played a substantial active role in managing the stock. In addition, sections 953(2)(E)(l)(b) and (2)(c) establish that to the extent a party demonstrates that the increase in value of a spouse’s non-marital stock resulted from reinvested income and capital gain, the increased value is nonmarital property unless it is also established that “either or both spouses had a substantial active role during the marriage in managing, preserving or improving the property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hedges v. Pitcher“Increase in value” includes: (a)Appreciation resulting from market forces; and (b)Appreciation resulting from reinvested income and capital gain unless either or both spouses had a substantial active role during the marriage in managing, preserving or improving the property. (2) “Increase in value”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Murphy v. Murphy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.