Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ME 156 - Warner v. Warner

Warner v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2025

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

90200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bryant v. Bryant · MacDonald v. MacDonald · Schneider v. Richardson · MacDonald v. MacDonald · Kapler v. Kapler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Revised section 953(2)(E)(l)(a) establishes that to the extent a party demonstrates that the increase in value of a spouse’s nonmarital stock resulted from “market forces,” the increased value is nonmarital property regardless of whether the spouse or spouses played a substantial active role in managing the stock. In addition, sections 953(2)(E)(l)(b) and (2)(c) establish that to the extent a party demonstrates that the increase in value of a spouse’s non-marital stock resulted from reinvested income and capital gain, the increased value is nonmarital property unless it is also established that “either or both spouses had a substantial active role during the marriage in managing, preserving or improving the property.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Increase in value” includes: (a)Appreciation resulting from market forces; and (b)Appreciation resulting from reinvested income and capital gain unless either or both spouses had a substantial active role during the marriage in managing, preserving or improving the property. (2) “Increase in value”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.