Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ME 86 - State v. James

State v. James’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Ohio v. Roberts · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Commonwealth v. Durling · United States v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he first step in analyzing the reliability of proffered [hearsay] evidence is to determine whether the evidence would be admissible under the rules of evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the Maine Rules of Evidence do not apply to probation revocation hearings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “admissible under standard evidentiary rules is presumptively reliable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.