Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ME 92 - Hoag v. Dick

Hoag v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2022

5 state decisions

20200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 80 Wash. 2d 293 - Friedlander v. Friedlander · Town of Baldwin v. Carter · Skelton v. Skelton · Wilson v. Wilson · 1 Or. App. 504 - Bauer v. Bauer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1.Not enforceable. A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that: A. That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily; or B. The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed and, before execution of the agreement, that party: (1) Was not provided a fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party; (2) Did not voluntarily and expressly waive, in writing, any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party beyond the disclosure provided; and (3) Did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party. 2. Support required. If a provision of a premarital agreement modifies or eliminates spousal support and that modification or elimination causes one party to the agreement to be eligible for support under a program of public assistance at the time of separation or marital dissolution, a court, notwithstanding the terms of the agreement, may require the other party to provide support to the extent necessary to avoid that eligibility. 3. Unconscionability. An issue of uncon-scionability of a premarital agreement must be decided by the court as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.