Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 MT 13 - State v. Brister

State v. Brister’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

82 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Finley · State v. Lenihan · State v. Gallagher · State v. Harris · State v. Nelson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the better rule [is] to allow an appellate court to review any sentence imposed in a criminal case, if it is alleged that such sentence is illegal or exceeds statutory mandates, even if no objection is made at the time of sentencing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where the issue is whether a court followed statutory requirements applicable to revocation of a suspended sentence, however, the question raised is a matter of law, and our review is plenary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he law in effect at the time of the commission of the crime controls as to the possible sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.