Nelson v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. Lacosta (2004), Orr v. State (2004)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russell v. Rolfs · 60 Cal. App. 4th 171 - Jackson v. County of Los Angeles · Johnson v. St. Patrick's Hospital · Bennett v. Dow Chemical Co. · Kauffman-Harmon v. Kauffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the estopped party had knowledge of the facts at the time he took the original position; (2) the estopped party succeeded in maintaining the original position; (3) the position presently taken is inconsistent with the original position; and (4) the original position misled the party so that allowing the estopped party to change its position would injuriously affect the adverse party.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) For the purposes of statutes relating to the time within which an action must be commenced: (a) a claim or cause of action accrues when all elements of the claim or cause exist or have occurred, the right to maintain an action on the claim or cause is complete, and a court or other agency is authorized to accept jurisdiction of the action; (3) The period of limitation does not begin on any claim or cause of action for an injury to person or property until the facts constituting the claim have been discovered or, in the exercise of due diligence, should have been discovered by the injured party if: (a) the facts constituting the claim are by their nature concealed or self-concealing;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Orr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.