State v. St. Marks’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably 223 Ill. 2d 187 - People v. Sutherland (2006), State v. Tackitt (2003)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · State v. Siegal · State v. Kuneff · State v. Reesman · State v. Rinehart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[A]s a matter of logic and common sense, a reviewing court cannot defer to a magistrate's consideration of an application for search warrant that the magistrate in effect did not review.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen assessing a search warrant application, `[t]he test is not to determine whether each individual fact presented in the application for search warrant establishes probable cause, but to determine from the totality of the circumstances whether there is probable cause.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barnaby“provided an indicia of reliability concerning [the confidential informant's] statements about the alleged criminal activity of St. Marks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barnaby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.