Mallak v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Henderson v. Morgan · State v. Hanson · State v. Bowley · State v. Redcrow · State v. Radi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a. the adequacy of the district court's interrogation as to the defendant's understanding of his plea; b. the promptness of the motion to withdraw the prior plea; and c. the fact that the defendant's plea was apparently the result of a plea bargain in which the guilty plea was given in exchange for dismissal of another charge. Mallak v. State, 2002 MT 35, ¶ 17 , 308 Mont. 314, ¶ 17 , 42 P.3d 794, ¶ 17 ; State v. Knox, 2001 MT 232, ¶ 11 , 307 Mont. 1, ¶ 11 , 36 P.3d 383, ¶ 11 ; State v. Bowley (1997), 282 Mont. 298, 304 , 938 P.2d 592, 595 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Graham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.