State v. Bingman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Van Kirk · State v. Guillaume · State v. Austad · State v. Scarborough · State v. Remillard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ M. R. Evid. 609 ] 'prohibits the admission of evidence that a witness has been convicted of a crime for the purpose of attacking that witness's credibility.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.