Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 MT 67 - State v. Clayton

State v. Clayton’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
11
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 222 Ill. 2d 530 - People v. Luedemann (2006), State v. Garcia-Cantu (2008)

60 state decisions — followed in 11 states

260200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Mendenhall · California v. Hodari D. · Michigan v. Chesternut · State v. Bullock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 35 (2002) (“The police officers did not initiate the stop, but only pulled in behind [the defendant] and shined.the spotlight to determine how many people were in the vehicle. The officers did not have their sirens or emergency lights on and the encounter took place on a public street.”); State v. Calhoun, 101 Or.App. 622 , 792 P.2d 1223, 1225 (1990) (noting that the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “central inquiry under the Fourth Amendment is the reasonableness under all the circumstances of a particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “would have believed that he was not free to leave,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.