State v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2025
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Van Kirk · State v. Weeks · State v. Anderson · State Ex Rel. Mazurek v. District Court of Montana Fourth Judicial District · State v. Langford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the declaration, act, or omission forms part of a transaction which is itself the fact in dispute or evidence of that fact, such declaration, act, or omission is evidence as part of the transaction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Guill“to understand the context of the alleged incest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Guill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.