State v. Perreault’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · State v. Howe · State v. Glaesman · United States v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he purpose of, a motion to dismiss is to test the sufficiency of the information or indictment. It is not a device for summary trial of the evidence, and facts not appearing on the face of the information cannot be considered. The court is obliged to confíne itself to the face of the information. Further, for purposes of the motion, all well-pleaded facts are taken to be true.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conrad · State v. Haibeck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.