Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ND 143 - State v. Berger

State v. Berger’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2024

4 state decisions

20200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanford v. King · United States v. Levitt · Davis v. State · State v. Drader · Morstad v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Except as provided in this section, the length of the period of probation imposed in conjunction with a sentence to probation or a suspended execution or deferred imposition of sentence may not extend for more than five years for a felony and two years for a misdemeanor or infraction from the later of the date of: a. The order imposing probation; b. The defendant’s release from incarceration; or c. Termination of the defendant’s parole.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.