Burke v. State

¶1Filed 2/20/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72002 ND 19

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Douglas Eric Guy, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20010136

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia A. Rothe-Seeger, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.

¶30

¶31Richard E. Edinger, P.O. Box 1295, Fargo, N.D. 58107-1295, for defendant and appellant.

¶32State v. Guy

¶33No. 20010136

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] We grant the State’s motion at oral argument to withdraw the material in its appendix, which appeared in violation of N.D.R.App.P. 30(a).

¶37[¶2] We summarily affirm the East Central Judicial District Court’s judgment of conviction of Douglas Eric Guy for gross sexual imposition, burglary, robbery, and felonious restraint, under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).  See, e.g., State v. Lewis, 291 N.W.2d 735, 737 (N.D. 1980) (declining to adopt the procedures outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)).

¶38[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶39Dale V. Sandstrom

¶40William A. Neumann

¶41Mary Muehlen Maring

¶42Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶43