Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ND 208 - Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.

Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Olander · Andrews v. O'HEARN · Okken v. Okken · Allen v. Kleven · State v. Bergeron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 61, no error is ground for granting a new trial or setting aside a verdict unless refusal to do so is inconsistent with substantial justice, and at every stage of a proceeding, a court must disregard any error or defect which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.