Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ND 28 - Hughes v. State

Hughes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Owens v. State · Abdi v. State · Murchison v. State · Syvertson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review an appeal from summary denial of post-conviction relief as we would review an appeal from a summary judgment. The party opposing the motion for summary disposition is entitled to all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence and is entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing if a reasonable inference raises a genuine issue of material fact. For summary judgment purposes, the evidentiary assertions of the party opposing the motion are assumed to be true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “show how, but for the attorneys' errors, the results of the proceedings would have been different”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.