Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 ND 32 - Bertsch v. Duemeland

Bertsch v. Duemeland’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Buchholz v. Buchholz · Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C. · Peterson v. Zerr · Livingood v. Meece · Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime; 2. Imputes to the person the present existence of an infectious, contagious, or loathsome disease; 3. Tends directly to injure the person in respect to the person’s office, profession, trade, or business, either by imputing to the person general disqualifications in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to the person’s office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits; 4. Imputes to the person impotence or want of chastity; or 5. By natural consequence causes actual damage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.