Marschner v. Marschner’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Grinaker v. Grinaker · Fox v. Fox · Barth v. Barth · Marschner v. Marschner · Zeller v. Zeller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is induced by an erroneous view of the law, if there is no evidence to support it, or if, although there is some evidence to support it, on the entire evidence, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Striefel v. Striefel“The burden is on the complaining party to demonstrate on appeal that a trial court's finding of fact is clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Striefel v. Striefel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.