Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2002 ND 97

Skadberg v. Skadberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2002

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2002-06-04

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2025

20 state decisions

80200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SANDSTROM, J„

¶1dissenting.

¶2[¶ 21] I continue to believe that “[r]e-spect for law and human dignity can best be fostered by a process that is fair and just.” Sandbeck, 524 N.W.2d at 852 (Sandstrom, J., dissenting). Rockwell was not afforded a fair and just process in that case. He clearly objected to the process and made a record of what he would have presented had he been permitted.

¶3[¶ 22] After careful review of the record in this case, I cannot conclude that Todd Skadberg objected to the process or *878was prevented from presenting evidence. I therefore concur in the result.

¶4[¶ 16] Dale V. Sandstrom

/2002/nd/97 · .json · Public domain