Interest—Settlement agreement—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed as to award of interest—Court of appeals' judgment of remand for an evidentiary hearing reversed—Interest to be computed from date of settlement, consistent with Hartmann v. Duffey.
.]
SNYDER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LINDSAY ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as Snyder v. Lindsay,
2002-Ohio-3319
.]
Interest—Settlement agreement—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed as to award
of interest—Court of appeals’ judgment of remand for an evidentiary
hearing reversed—Interest to be computed from date of settlement,
consistent with Hartmann v. Duffey.
(No. 2001-1050—Submitted June 5, 2002—Decided July 10, 2002.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 78121.
__________________
{¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the
award of interest, but reversed as to the remand for an evidentiary hearing.
Interest is to be computed by the trial court from the date of settlement,
consistent with our decision in Hartmann v. Duffey,
.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and
COOK, JJ., concur.
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
__________________
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting.
{¶2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Hartmann
v. Duffey,
, at ¶17-
22. I respectfully dissent.
__________________
The Okey Law Firm, L.P.A., Steven P. Okey and Brian R. Wilson, for
appellants.
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Moscarino & Treu, L.L.P., Kevin M. Norchi, Edward S. Jerse and William
H. Falin, for appellee Robert F. Lindsay, D.O.
Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., Brian D. Sullivan and Martin T. Galvin,
for appellee Dunlap Memorial Hospital.
__________________
2
