Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2002 OK 89 - Lamson & Sessions v. Doyle

Lamson & Sessions v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Parks v. Norman Municipal Hospital · Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. Cook · Special Indemnity Fund v. Choate · Benning v. Pennwell Publishing Co. · Barnsdall Refining Co. v. Ramsdall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our holding today regarding the statute of limitations should not be interpreted to mean Claimant did not need to give Employer notice of his request for additional compensation to allow it to prepare an adequate defense. The Form 9, with medical evidence attached, served this purpose. As noted by Claimant, Employer was apparently adequately informed by the Form 9. Employer presented an addendum to the previously submitted medical opinion of its expert [in response to Claimant's expert opinion]. Moreover, Employer took [Claimant's expert's] deposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under the [Workers' Compensation] Act, `injury' includes the consequences that naturally flow from the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence of one expert may be accepted while that of another may be rejected in whole or in part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.